NEW YORK NEWSDAY Letters to Editor published on April 22, 1997 "Sealed Adoption Papers Cause the Greatest Pain" ******************************************************** Some claim the need for secrecy because of the vague potential for "some sort of interpersonal boomerang" between me and my birth relatives. This patronizing attitude dominates the pro-closed adoption records argument. The mutual consent registries mentioned are woefully understaffed, underfunded and underutilized. In cases where non- identifying information is available, it usually only covers the period up to the time of the adoptee's birth. What about cancer, diabetes, heart disease and other illnesses that usually don't show up until later in life? In Scotland, adoptee records have been open since 1935. In England, since 1975. Australia, Norway, Finland, Israel, Mexico and many other nations have open records for adult adoptees. Marian Cole. Brooklyn **************************************************** I am a birth mother who gave up a child for adoption in 1972. This decision was right for both of us at the time, but now that he is an adult, it is equally as important that he be given information regarding his heritage. Adult adoptees who search are not looking for new parents. They have adoptive parents who have earned their respect and love. They are just looking for answers. Opponents of open records state that open records would increase abortion, when the opposite is true. The two states that have open records, (Alaska and Kansas) actually have lower abortion and higher adoption rates than the average. Susan Tomhave. Minneapolis, MN ***************************************************************** As a birth mother, I am insulted by the suggestion that I would have dumped my baby rather than risk being reminded in later years. If I had to give advice to a teenager today, I would advocate abortion before advocating the pain of a closed adoption. Pam Gurd. Los Alamos, NM
![]()
Member of the Internet Link Exchange
Back to Bastard Nation